MLOps Blog

Machine Learning Experiment Management: How to Organize Your Model Development Process

11 min

Jakub Czakon, Siddhant Sadangi

26th April, 2023

ML Model Development MLOps

Machine learning or deep learning experiment tracking is a key factor in delivering successful outcomes. There’s no way you will succeed without it.

Let me share a story that I’ve heard too many times.

”So I was developing a machine learning model with my team and within a few weeks of extensive experimentation, we got promising results…

…unfortunately, we couldn’t tell exactly what performed best because we didn’t track feature versions, didn’t record the parameters, and used different environments to run our models…

…after a few weeks, we weren’t even sure what we have actually tried so we needed to rerun pretty much everything”

Sounds familiar?

In this article, I will show you how you can keep track of your machine learning experiments and organize your model development efforts so that stories like that will never happen to you.

You will learn about:

What is Machine Learning experiment management?

Experiment management in the context of machine learning is a process of tracking experiment metadata like:

code versions,
data versions,
hyperparameters,
environment,
metrics,

organizing them in a meaningful way and making them available to access and collaborate on within your organization.

In the next sections, you will see exactly what that means with examples and implementations.

How to keep track of Machine Learning experimentation

What I mean by tracking is collecting all the metainformation about your machine learning experiments that is needed to:

share your results and insights with the team (and you in the future),
reproduce results of the machine learning experiments,
keep your results, that take a long time to generate, safe.

Let’s go through all the pieces of an experiment that I believe should be recorded, one by one.

Code version control for data science

Okay, in 2022 I think pretty much everyone working with code knows about version control. Failing to keep track of your code is a big (but obvious and easy-to-fix) oversight.

Should we just proceed to the next section? Not so fast.

Problem 1: Jupyter notebook version control

A large part of data science development is happening in Jupyter notebooks which are more than just code. Fortunately, there are tools that help with notebook versioning and diffing. Some tools that I know:

nbconvert (.ipynb -> .py conversion)
nbdime (diffing)
jupytext (conversion+versioning)
neptune-notebooks (versioning+diffing+sharing)

Once you have your notebook versioned, I would suggest going the extra mile and making sure that it runs top to bottom. For that you can use jupytext or nbconvert:

jupyter nbconvert --to script train_model.ipynb;
python train_model.py

Problem 2: Experiments on dirty commits

Data science people tend to not follow the best practices of software development. You can always find someone (me included) who would ask:

“But how about tracking code in-between commits? What if someone runs an experiment without committing the code?”

One option is to explicitly forbid running code on dirty commits (commits that contain modified or untracked files). Another option is to give users an additional safety net and snapshot code whenever they run an experiment.

Neptune logs your git info while tracking a run, and alerts you if the run was started in a dirty repo.

The Neptune jupyter client also auto-saves notebook checkpoints of tracked notebooks to the connected run so that your local changes won’t be lost.

Tracking hyperparameters

Most decent machine learning models and pipelines have tuned non-default hyperparameters. Those could be learning rate, number of trees or a missing value imputation method. Failing to keep track of hyperparameters can result in weeks of wasted time looking for them or retraining models.

...
train = pd.read_csv('/path/to/my/train.csv')

model = Model(objective='binary',
              metric='auc',
              learning_rate=0.1,
              num_boost_round=200,
              num_leaves=60,
              feature_fraction=0.2)
model.fit(train)

valid = pd.read_csv('/path/to/my/valid.csv')
model.evaluate(valid)

We all do that sometimes but it is not a great idea especially if someone will need to take over your work.

Ok, so I do like .yaml configs and passing arguments from the command line (option 1 and 2), but anything other than magic numbers is fine. What is important is that you log those parameters for every experiment.

If you decide to pass all parameters as the script arguments make sure to log them somewhere. It is easy to forget, so using an experiment management tool that does this automatically can save you here.

parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument('--number_trees')
parser.add_argument('--learning_rate')
args = parser.parse_args()

experiment_manager.create_experiment(params=vars(args))
...
# experiment logic
...

There is nothing so painful as to have a perfect script on a perfect data version producing perfect metrics only to discover that you don’t remember what are the hyperparameters that were passed as arguments.

Neptune

Neptune makes it very easy to keep track of hyperparameters across runs by giving various options:

Log hyperparameters individually:

run["parameters/epoch_nr"] = 5
run["parameters/batch_size"] = 32
run["parameters/dense"] = 512
run["parameters/optimizer"] = "sgd"
run["parameters/metrics"] = ["accuracy", "mae"]
run["parameters/activation"] = "relu"

Log all of them together as a dictionary:

# Define parameters
params = {
	"epoch_nr": 5,
	"batch_size": 32,
	"dense": 512,
	"optimizer": "sgd",
	"metrics": ["accuracy", "binary_accuracy"],
	"activation": "relu",
}

# Pass parameters
run["parameters"] = params

In both the above cases, the parameters are logged under the All Metadata section of the run UI:

You can also upload configuration files (like the config.yaml file used for Hydra) directly:

run["config_file"].upload("config.yaml")

This file will be logged under the All Metadata section of the run UI:

Data versioning

In real-life projects, data is changing over time. Some typical situations include:

new images are added,
labels are improved,
mislabeled/wrong data is removed,
new data tables are discovered,
new features are engineered and processed,
validation and testing datasets change to reflect the production environment.

Whenever your data changes, the output of your analysis, report or experiment results will likely change even though the code and environment did not. That is why to make sure you are comparing apples to apples you need to keep track of your data versions.

Having almost everything versioned and getting different results can be extremely frustrating, and can mean a lot of time (and money) in wasted effort. The sad part is that you can do little about it afterward. So again, keep your experiment data versioned.

For the vast majority of use cases whenever new data comes in you can save it in a new location and log this location and a hash of the data. Even if the data is very large, for example when dealing with images, you can create a smaller metadata file with image paths and labels and track changes of that file.

A wise man once told me:

“Storage is cheap, training a model for 2 weeks on an 8-GPU node is not.”

And if you think about it, logging this information doesn’t have to be rocket science.

exp.set_property('data_path', 'DATASET_PATH')
exp.set_property('data_version', md5_hash('DATASET_PATH'))

You can calculate hash yourself, use a simple data versioning extension or outsource hashing to a full-blown data versioning tool like DVC.

You can calculate and log the hash yourself, or use a full-fledged data versioning tool that gives you greater versioning capabilities. Read more about some of the best tools available in the market below.

Tracking model performance metrics

I have never found myself in a situation where I thought that I have logged too many metrics for my experiment, have you?

In a real-world project, the metrics you care about can change due to new discoveries or changing specifications so logging more metrics can actually save you some time and trouble in the future.

Either way, my suggestion is:

“Log metrics, log them all”

Typically, metrics are as simple as a single number

exp.send_metric('train_auc', train_auc)
exp.send_metric('valid_auc', valid_auc)

but I like to think of it as something a bit broader. To understand if your model has improved, you may want to take a look at a chart, confusion matrix or distribution of predictions. Those, in my view, are still metrics because they help you measure the performance of your experiment.

exp.send_image('diagnostics', 'confusion_matrix.png')
exp.send_image('diagnostics', 'roc_auc.png')
exp.send_image('diagnostics', 'prediction_dist.png')

Tracking metrics both on training and validation datasets can help you assess the risk of the model not performing well in production. The smaller the gap the lower the risk. A great resource is this kaggle days talk by Jean-François Puget.

Moreover, if you are working with data collected at different timestamps you can assess model performance decay and suggest a proper model retraining schema. Simply track metrics at different timeframes of your validation data and see how the performance drops.

Dig deeper

Read the article: Performance Metrics in Machine Learning [Complete Guide]

Check how to log and track model building metadata in Neptune

Versioning experiment environment

The majority of problems with environment versioning can be summarized by the infamous quote:

“I don’t understand, it worked on my machine.”

One approach that helps solve this issue can be called “environment as code” where the environment can be created by executing instructions (bash/yaml/docker) step-by-step. By embracing this approach you can switch from versioning the environment to versioning environment set-up code which we know how to do.

There are a few options that I know to be used in practice (by no means this is a full list of approaches).

Docker images

This is the preferred option and there are a lot of resources on the subject. One that I particularly like is the “Learn Enough Docker to be useful” series by Jeff Hale. In a nutshell, you define the Dockerfile with some instructions.

# Use a miniconda3 as base image
FROM continuumio/miniconda3

# Installation of jupyterlab
RUN pip install jupyterlab==0.35.6 &&
pip install jupyterlab-server==0.2.0 &&
conda install -c conda-forge nodejs

# Installation of Neptune and enabling neptune extension
RUN pip install neptune &&
pip install neptune-notebooks &&
jupyter labextension install neptune-notebooks

# Setting up Neptune API token as env variable
ARG NEPTUNE_API_TOKEN
ENV NEPTUNE_API_TOKEN=$NEPTUNE_API_TOKEN

# Adding current directory to container
ADD . /mnt/workdir
WORKDIR /mnt/workdir

You build your environment from those instructions:

docker build -t jupyterlab
    --build-arg NEPTUNE_API_TOKEN=$NEPTUNE_API_TOKEN .

And you can run scripts on the environment by going:

docker run
    -p 8888:8888
    jupyterlab:latest
    /opt/conda/bin/jupyter lab
    --allow-root
    --ip=0.0.0.0
    --port=8888

The example I showed was used to run a Neptune enabled Jupyterlab server on AWS. Check it out if you are interested.

Conda Environments

It’s a simpler option and in many cases, it is enough to manage your environments with no problems. It doesn’t give you as many options or guarantees as docker does, but it can be enough for your use case.The environment can be defined as a .yaml configuration file just like this one:

name: salt

dependencies:
   - pip=19.1.1
   - python=3.6.8
   - psutil
   - matplotlib
   - scikit-image

- pip:
   - neptune-client==0.3.0
   - neptune-contrib==0.9.2
   - imgaug==0.2.5
   - opencv_python==3.4.0.12
   - torch==0.3.1
   - torchvision==0.2.0
   - pretrainedmodels==0.7.0
   - pandas==0.24.2
   - numpy==1.16.4
   - cython==0.28.2
   - pycocotools==2.0.0

You can create conda environment by running:

conda env create -f environment.yaml

What is pretty cool is that you can always dump the state of your environment to such config by running:

conda env export > environment.yaml

Simple and gets the job done.

Makefile

You can always define all your bash instructions explicitly in the Makefile. For example:

git clone git@github.com:neptune-ml/open-solution-mapping-challenge.git
cd open-solution-mapping-challenge

pip install -r requirements.txt

mkdir data
cd data
curl -0 https://www.kaggle.com/c/imagenet-object-localization-challenge/data/LOC_synset_mapping.txt

and set it up by running:

source Makefile

It is often difficult to read those files and you are giving up a ton of additional features of conda and/or docker but it doesn’t get much simpler than this.

Now, that you have your environment defined as code, make sure to log the environment file for every experiment.

Again, if you are using an experiment manager you can snapshot your code whenever you create a new experiment, even if you forget to git commit:

experiment_manager.create_experiment(upload_source_files=['environment.yml')
...
# machine learning magic
...

and have it safely stored in the app:

Versioning Machine Learning models

You have now trained a model using its optimal hyperparameters and have logged and versioned the data, hyperparameters, and the environment. But what about the model itself? In most cases, training and inference happen in different places (scripts/notebooks), and you need to be able to make the model you’ve trained available for inference somewhere else.

There are two basic ways to do this:

1. Save the model as a binary file

You can export the model as a binary file and load it from the binary file wherever you need to make inferences.

There are multiple ways you can do this – libraries like PyTorch and Keras have their own save and load methods, while outside of deep-learning Pickle remains the most popular way to save and load a model from a file:

import pickle

# To save a model
with open(“saved_model.pkl”, “wb”) as f:
	pickle.dumps(trained_model, f)

# To load a model
with open(“saved_model.pkl”, “rb”) as f:
	model = pickle.load(f)

Since the model is saved as a file, you can use file versioning tools like git, or upload the file to experiment trackers like Neptune:

run[“trained_model”].upload(“saved_model.pkl”)

2. Use a model registry

A model registry is a central repository for publishing and accessing models. It is a place where ML developers can push their models to be used by other stakeholders or themselves at a later point in time.

Learn more

ML Model Registry: What It Is, Why It Matters, How to Implement It

Some popular model registries available currently are:

a) Neptune:

Neptune is a metadata store for MLOps, built for research and production teams that run a lot of experiments.

It gives you a central place to log, store, display, organize, compare, and query all metadata generated during the machine learning lifecycle.

Individuals and organizations use Neptune for experiment tracking and model registry to have control over their experimentation and model development.

Neptune provides:

API integrations with the most known libraries in the MLOps ecosystem;
API integration with the model training environment;
annotation and description tools for managing registered models;
test-set prediction previews and model explanations;
API to query and retrieve model information.

May be useful

→ Lessons learned by engineers behind neptune.ai when building an experiment tracking tool

b) MLflow:

The MLflow Model Registry is one of the few open-source model registries available in the market today. You can decide to manage this on your infrastructure or use a fully-managed implementation on a platform like Databricks.

MLflow provides:

annotation and description tools for tagging models, providing documentation and model information such as the date the model was registered, modification history of the registered model, the model owner, stage, version, and so on;
,odel versioning to automatically keep track of versions for registered models when updated;
an API integration to serve machine learning models as RESTful APIs for online testing, dashboard updates, etc;
CI/CD workflow integration to record stage transitions, request, review, and approve changes as part of CI/CD pipelines for better control and governance;
a model stage feature to assign preset or custom stages to each model version, like “Staging” and “Production” to represent the lifecycle of a model;
configuration for promotion schemes to easily move models across different stages.

c) Amazon Sagemaker model registry

Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that developers can use for every step of ML development, including model registry. The model registry is part of the suite of MLOps offerings in SageMaker that helps users build and operationalize machine learning solutions by automating and standardizing MLOps practices across their organization.

With the SageMaker model registry you can do the following:

catalog models for production;
manage model versions;
associate metadata, such as training metrics, with a model;
manage the approval status of a model;
deploy models to production;
automate model deployment with CI/CD.

How to organize your model development process?

As much as I think tracking experimentation and ensuring the reproducibility of your work is important it is just a part of the puzzle. Once you have tracked hundreds of experiment runs you will quickly face new problems:

how to search through and visualize all of those experiments,
how to organize them into something that you and your colleagues can digest,
how to make this data shareable and accessible inside your team/organization?

This is where experiment management tools really come in handy. They let you:

filter/sort/tag/group experiments,
visualize/compare experiment runs,
share (app and programmatic query API) experiment results and metadata.

For example, by sending a link I can share a comparison of machine learning experiments with all the additional information available.

Experiment management compare — *See in the app*

With that, you and all the people on your team know exactly what is happening when it comes to model development. It makes it easy to track the progress, discuss problems, and discover new improvement ideas.

Working in creative iterations

Tools like that are a big help and a huge improvement from spreadsheets and notes. However, what I believe can take your machine learning projects to the next level is a focused experimentation methodology that I call creative iterations.

Check also

Best Tools to Manage Machine Learning Projects
Data Science Project Management

I’d like to start with some pseudocode and explain it later:

time, budget, business_goal = business_specification()

creative_idea = initial_research(business_goal)

while time and budget and not business_goal:
   solution = develop(creative_idea)
   metrics = evaluate(solution, validation_data)
   if metrics > best_metrics:
      best_metrics = metrics
      best_solution = solution
   creative_idea = explore_results(best_solution)

   time.update()
   budget.update()

In every project, there is a phase where the business_specification is created that usually entails a timeframe, budget, and goal of the machine learning project. When I say goal, I mean a set of KPIs, business metrics, or if you are super lucky, machine learning metrics. At this stage, it is very important to manage business expectations but it’s a story for another day. If you are interested in those things I suggest you take a look at some articles by Cassie Kozyrkov, for instance, this one.

Assuming that you and your team know what is the business goal you can do initial_research and cook up a baseline approach, a first creative_idea. Then you develop it and come up with a solution which you need to evaluate and get your first set of metrics. Those, as mentioned before, don’t have to be simple numbers (and often are not) but could be charts, reports or user study results. Now you should study your solution, metrics, and explore_results.

It may be here where your project will end because:

your first solution is good enough to satisfy business needs,
you can reasonably expect that there is no way to reach business goals within the previously assumed time and budget,
you discover that there is a low-hanging fruit problem somewhere close and your team should focus their efforts there.

If none of the above apply, you list all the underperforming parts of your solution and figure out which ones could be improved and what creative_ideas can get you there. Once you have that list, you need to prioritize them based on expected goal improvements and budget. If you are wondering how can you estimate those improvements, the answer is simple: results exploration.

You have probably noticed that results exploration comes up a lot. That’s because it is so very important that it deserves its own section.

Model results exploration

This is an extremely important part of the process. You need to understand thoroughly where the current approach fails, how far time/budget wise are you from your goal, what are the risks associated with using your approach in production. In reality, this part is far from easy but mastering it is extremely valuable because:

it leads to business problem understanding,
it leads to focusing on the problems that matter and saves a lot of time and effort for the team and organization,
it leads to discovering new business insights and project ideas.

Some popular model interpretation tools currently used are:

SHAP:

SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) is a game theoretic approach to explain the output of any machine learning model. It connects optimal credit allocation with local explanations using the classic Shapley values from game theory and their related extensions.

Read how to use SHAP in their docs.

LIME

Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) is a paper in which the authors propose a concrete implementation of local surrogate models. Surrogate models are trained to approximate the predictions of the underlying black box model. Instead of training a global surrogate model, LIME focuses on training local surrogate models to explain individual predictions. The current Python implementation supports tabular, text, and image classifiers.

treeinterpreter

This is a package for interpreting scikit-learn’s decision tree and random forest predictions. Allows decomposing each prediction into bias and feature contribution components. Learn usage here.

Some good resources I found on the subject are:

“Understanding and diagnosing your machine-learning models” PyData talk by Gael Varoquaux

“Creating correct and capable classifiers” PyData talk by Ian Osvald

Using the ‘What-If Tool’ to investigate Machine Learning models article by Parul Pandey

Diving deeply into results exploration is a story for another day and another blog post, but the key takeaway is that investing your time in understanding your current solution can be extremely beneficial for your business.

Interpretable Machine Learning book by Christoph Molnar
ML Model Interpretation Tools blog by Abhishek Jha

Final thoughts

In this article, I explained:

what experiment management is,
how organizing your model development process improves your workflow.

For me, adding experiment management tools to my “standard” software development best practices was an aha-moment that made my machine learning projects more likely to succeed. I think, if you give it a go you will feel the same.