MLOps Blog

15 Best Tools for ML Experiment Tracking and Management

7 min

Patrycja Jenkner

22nd February, 2023

Machine Learning Tools

While working on a machine learning project, getting good results from a single model-training run is one thing. But keeping all of your machine learning experiments well organized and having a process that lets you draw valid conclusions from them is quite another.

The answer to these needs is experiment tracking. In machine learning, experiment tracking is the process of saving all experiment-related information that you care about for every experiment you run.

ML teams implement experiment tracking in different ways, may it be by using spreadsheets, GitHub, or self-built platforms. Yet, the most effective option is to do it with tools designed specifically for tracking and managing ML experiments.

In this article, we overview and compare the 15 best tools that will allow you to track and manage your ML experiments. You’ll get to know their main features and see how they are different from each other. Hopefully, this will help you evaluate them and choose the right one for your needs.

How to evaluate an experiment tracking tool?

There’s no one answer to the question “what is the best experiment tracking tool?”. Your motivation and needs may be completely different when you work individually or in a team. And, depending on your role, you may be looking for various functionalities.

If you’re a Data Scientist or a Researcher, you should consider:

If the tool comes with a web UI or it’s console-based;
If you can integrate the tool with your preferred model training frameworks;
What metadata you can log, display, and compare (code, text, audio, video, etc.);
Can you easily compare multiple runs? If so, in what format – only table, or also charts;
If organizing and searching through experiments is user-friendly;
If you can customize metadata structure and dashboards;
If the tool lets you track hardware consumption;
How easy it is to collaborate with other team members – can you just share a link to the experiment or you have to use screenshots as a workaround?

As an ML Engineer, you should check if the tool lets you:

Easily reproduce and re-run experiments;
Track and search through experiment lineage (data/models/experiments used downstream);
Save, fetch, and cache datasets for experiments;
Integrate it with your CI/CD pipeline;
Easily collaborate and share work with your colleagues.

Finally, as an ML team lead, you’ll be interested in:

General business-related stuff like pricing model, security, and support;
How much infrastructure the tool requires, how easy it is to integrate it into your current workflow;
Is the product delivered as commercial software, open-source software, or a managed cloud service?
What collaboration, sharing, and review feature it has.

I made sure to keep these motivations in mind when reviewing the tools that are on the market. So let’s take a closer look at them.

The best tools for ML experiment tracking and management

Before we dig into each tool, here’s a high-level comparison of features and integrations of the 15 best experiment tracking and management tools.

Note: This table was last updated on 20 December 2021. Some information may be outdated today. See some incorrect info? Let us know, and we’ll update it.

Open table in new tab

	Neptune	Weights & Biases	Comet	Sacred & Omniboard	MLflow	TensorBoard	Guild AI	Polyaxon	ClearML	Valohai	Pachyderm	Kubeflow	Verta.ai	SageMaker Studio	DVC Studio
Focus	Metadata Storage, Experiment Tracking, Model Registry	Experiment Management	Experiment Management	Experiment Management	Entire Lifecycle	Experiment Management	Experiment Management	Experiment Management	Experiment Management	Entire Lifecycle	Entire Lifecycle	Run Orchestration	Entire Lifecycle	Entire Lifecycle	Data Versioning
Price	Individual: Free (+ usage above free quota) Academia: Free Team: Paid	Individual: Free (+ usage above free quota) Academia: Free Team: Paid	Individual: Free (+ usage above free quota) Academia: Free Team: Paid	Free	Free	Free	Free	Paid	Free or paid, depending on the plan	Paid	NA	Free	Open-source: free Hosted: paid	You pay extra on top of compute	DVC: free DVC Studio: free or paid, depending on the plan
Standalone component or a part of a broader ML platform?	Standalone component. ML metadata store that focuses on experiment tracking and model registry	Standalone component	Stand-alone tool with community, self-serve and managed deployment options	Omniboard is a web dashboard for the Sacred machine learning experiment management tool	Open-source platform which offers four separate components for experiment tracking, code packaging, model deploymnet, and model registry	Open source tool which is a part of the TensorFlow ecosystem	Stand-alone open-source platform	Standalone tool	Standalone open-source platform	Standalone component	Standalone tool	Part of the Kubernetes environment	Standalone component	Part of the AWS SageMaker ecosystem	Standalone component
Commercial software, open-source software, or a managed cloud service?	Managed cloud service	Managed cloud service	Managed cloud service	Open-source	The standalone product is open-source, while the Databricks managed version is commercial	TensorBoarsd is open-source, while TensorBoard.dev is available as a free managed cloud service	Open-source	Offers both an open-source community plan, and various managed cloud options	Available both as an open-source platform, and a managed cloud service	Managed Cloud Service	Base package is open-source, with an enterprise grade commercial offering available	The base product is open source, with managed distributions made available by cloud providers	Available both as an open-source platform, and a managed cloud service	Managed Cloud Service	Open-source and managed cloud service
Hosted version or deployed on-premise?	Tracking is hosted on a managed server, and can also be deployed on-premises and in a public/private cloud server	Yes	Yes, you can deploy Comet on any cloud environment or on-premise	Can be deployed both on-premises and/or on the cloud, but has to be self-managed	Tracking is hosted on a local/remote server (on-prem or cloud). Is also available on a managed server as part of the Databricks platform	TensorBoard is hosted locally. TensorBoard.dev is available on a managed server as a free service	Can be deployed both on-premises and/or on the cloud, but has to be self-managed	Can be hosted both on-prem and on the cloud	Available both on-prem and on cloud	Available both on-prem and on cloud	Can be hosted both on-prem and on the cloud	Almost all popular cloud providers maintain their own distribution of Kubeflow. It can also be installed on-premises manually. Read about the different installation options available here	Available both on-prem and on cloud	AWS Sagemaker is available only as a fully managed cloud service	Tracking is hosted on a managed server, and can also be deployed on-premises and in a public/private cloud server
How much do you have to change in your training process?	Minimal. Just a few lines of code needed for tracking	Minimal. Just a few lines of code needed for tracking	Minimal. Few lines of code needed for tracking	Minimal. Only a few lines of code need to be added	Minimal. Few lines of code needed for tracking	Minimal if already using the TensorFlow framework, else significant	No code change required for basic tracking	Extensive code and infrastructure changes required	Minimal. Just a few lines of code needed for tracking.	No code change required. Some additional workflow steps are added though	Extensive code and infrastructure changes required	Extensive code and infrastructure changes required	Minimal. Few lines of code needed for tracking	AWS Application Migration Service lets you lift-and-shift your code to AWS without any change required. Minimal change required to migrate Jupyter notebooks from local to Sagemaker Studio	Minimal. Just a few lines of code needed for tracking
Web UI or console-based?	Web UI	Web UI	Web UI	Web UI	Web UI	Web UI	Both CLI and Web UI	Both Web UI and CLI	Web UI	Both Web UI and CLI	Both Web UI and CLI	Web UI	Web UI	Both web UI and CLI	Both web and console UI
Log and display of metadata
– Dataset	Limited	Limited	Limited	Limited	Limited	Limited		Limited	Limited	Limited	Limited	Limited		Limited	Limited
– Code Versions				Limited	Limited		Limited		Limited	Limited		Limited
– Parameters
– Metrics and losses				Limited		Limited	Limited	Limited	Limited			Limited			Limited
– Images		Limited	N/A					Limited				N/A
– Audio											N/A
– Video											N/A
– Hardware consumption	Limited	Limited	Limited	Limited				Limited	Limited					Limited
Comparing experiment
– Table format diff										Limited
– Overlayed learning curves
– Code	Limited	Limited		Limited			Limited
Organizing and searching experiments and metadata
– Experiment table customization		Limited	Limited	Limited					Limited			Limited
– Custom dashboards	Limited		Limited					Limited				Limited	Limited	Limited
– Nested metadata structure support in the UI												Limited
Reproducibility and traceability
– One-command experiment re-run							Limited				N/A	N/A
– Experiment lineage			Limited					Limited				Limited
– Environment versioning											N/A	N/A
– Saving/fetching/caching datasets for experiments							Limited				N/A	N/A
Collaboration and knowledge sharing
– User groups and ACL	Only for Teams and Enterprise customers	Only for paid plans	Only for Teams Pro and Enterprise		Only in the managed version			Only available in the commercial version	Only for enterprise customers	Only for enterprise customers	Only in the enterprise edition		Only for enterprise customers		Only for Teams and Enterprise customers
– Sharing UI links with project members						Only in TensorBoard.dev	Limited				N/A	N/A
– Sharing UI links with external people						Only in TensorBoard.dev	Limited				N/A	N/A
– Commenting												N/A	Limited
Integrations
R	Limited					Limited
TensorBoard	Limited					N/A
MLFlow	Limited				N/A
Sacred				N/A
Amazon SageMaker														N/A
Google Colab					Limited
Kubeflow												N/A
Keras							Limited
Tensorflow							Limited
Pytorch
Scikit-Learn
LightGBM
XGBoost
fastai			No native integrations, only examples available
skorch
PyTorch Lightning
PyTorch Ignitet	Limited
Catalyst
Optuna
Scikit-Optimize	Limited
RayTune
Huggingface
Prophet														Amazon’s own Prophet distribution

1. Neptune

Neptune is a metadata store for any MLOps workflow. It was built for both research and production teams that run a lot of experiments. It lets you monitor, visualize, and compare thousands of ML models in one place.

Neptune supports experiment tracking, model registry, and model monitoring and it’s designed in a way that enables easy collaboration.

Users can create projects within the app, work on them together, and share UI links with each other (or even with external stakeholders). All this functionality makes Neptune the link between all members of the ML team.

Neptune is available in the cloud version and can be deployed on-premise. It’s also integrated with 25+ other tools and libraries, including multiple model training and hyperparameter optimization tools.

Main advantages:

Possibility to log and display all metadata types including parameters, model weights, images, HTML, audio, video, etc.;
Flexible metadata structure that allows you to organize training and production metadata the way you want to;
Easy to navigate web UI that allows you to compare experiments and create customized dashboards.

2. Weights & Biases

Weight & Biases is a machine learning platform built for experiment tracking, dataset versioning, and model management. For the experiment tracking part, its main focus is to help Data Scientists track every part of the model training process, visualize models, and compare experiments.

W&B is also available in the cloud and as an on-premise tool. In terms of integrations, Weights & Biases support multiple other frameworks and libraries including Keras, PyTorch environment, TensorFlow, Fastai, Scikit-learn, and more.

Main advantages:

A user-friendly and interactive dashboard that’s a central place of all experiments in the app. It allows users to organize and visualize results of their model training process;
Hyperparameter search and model optimization with W&B Sweeps;
Diffing and deduplication of logged datasets.

Recommended for you

️ Weights & Biases vs Neptune

3. Comet

Comet is an ML platform that helps data scientists track, compare, explain and optimize experiments and models across the model’s entire lifecycle, i.e. from training to production. In terms of experiment tracking, data scientists can register datasets, code changes, experimentation history, and models.

Comet is available for teams, individuals, academics, organizations, and anyone who wants to easily visualize experiments, facilitate work and run experiments. It can be used as a hosted platform or deployed on-premise.

Main advantages:

Fully-customizable experiment table within the web-based user interface;
Extensive comparison features—code, hyperparameters, metrics, predictions, dependencies, system metrics, and more;
Dedicated modules for vision, audio, text, and tabular data that allow for easy identification of issues with the dataset.

4. Sacred + Omniboard

Sacred is open-source software that allows machine learning researchers to configure, organize, log, and reproduce experiments. Sacred doesn’t come with its proper UI but there are a few dashboarding tools that you can connect to it, such as Omniboard (but you can also use others, such as Sacredboard, or Neptune via integration).

Sacred doesn’t have the scalability of the previous tools and has not been adapted to team collaboration (unless integrated with another tool), however, it has great potential when it comes to individual research.

Main advantages:

Possibility to connect it to the preferred UI;
Possibility to track any model training developed with any Python library;
Extensive experiment parameters customization options.

5. MLflow

MLflow is an open-source platform that helps manage the whole machine learning lifecycle. This includes experimentation, but also model storage, reproducibility, and deployment. Each of these four elements is represented by one MLflow component: Tracking, Model Registry, Projects, and Models.

The MLflow Tracking component consists of an API and UI that support logging various metadata (including parameters, code versions, metrics, and output files) and later visualizing the results.

Main advantages:

Focus on the whole lifecycle of the machine learning process;
Strong and big community of users that provide community support;
Open interface that can be integrated with any ML library or language.

Learn more

️ MLflow vs Neptune

6. TensorBoard

TensorBoard is the visualization toolkit for TensorFlow, so it’s often the first choice of TensorFlow users. TensorBoard offers a suite of features for the visualization and debugging of machine learning models. Users can track experiment metrics like loss and accuracy, visualize the model graph, project embeddings to a lower-dimensional space, and much more.

There’s also TensorBoard.dev that lets you upload and share your ML experiment results with anyone (collaboration features are missing in TensorBoard). TensorBoard is open-sourced and hosted locally, while TensorBoard.dev is available on a managed server as a free service.

Main advantages:

Well-developed features related to working with images, e.g. TensorBoard’s Projector that allows you to visualize any vector representation like word embeddings and images;
The What-If Tool (WIT), that’s an easy-to-use interface for expanding understanding of black-box classification and regression ML models
Strong and big community of users that provide community support.

May be useful

️ TensorBoard vs Neptune

️ The Best TensorBoard Alternatives (2020 Update)

7. Guild AI

Guild AI is an experiment tracking system for machine learning, available under the Apache 2.0 open source license. It’s equipped with features that allow you to run analysis, visualization, and diffing, automate pipelines, tune hyperparameters with AutoML, do scheduling, parallel processing, and remote training.

Guild AI also comes with multiple integrated tools for comparing experiments, such as:

Guild Compare – a curses-based application that lets you view runs in a spreadsheet format including flags and scalar values,
Guild View – a web-based application that lets you view runs and compare results,
Guild Diff – a command that lets you compares two runs.

Main advantages:

No need to change the code, it runs scripts written in any language or framework;
Doesn’t require additional software or systems like databases or containers
Strong and big community of users that provide community support.

Check also

️ Guild AI vs Neptune

8. Polyaxon

Polyaxon is a platform for reproducible and scalable machine learning and deep learning applications. It includes a wide range of features from tracking and optimization of experiments to model management, run orchestration, and regulatory compliance. The main goal of its developers is to maximize the results and productivity while saving costs.

In terms of experiment tracking, Polyaxon allows you to automatically record key model metrics, hyperparameters, visualizations, artifacts, and resources, as well as version control code and data. To later display the logged metadata, you can use Polyaxon UI or integrate it with another board, e.g. TensorBoard.

Polyaxon can be deployed on-premise or on a cloud provider of your choice. It also supports major ML and DL libraries, such as TensorFlow, Keras, or Scikit-learn.

Main advantages:

Polyaxon UI that’s represented by the Runs Dashboard with visualization capabilities, collaboration features, and extendable interface;
Collaboration features and project management tools;
Scalable solution – offers different plans from open source to cloud and enterprise.

May interest you

️ Polyaxon vs Neptune

9. ClearML

ClearML is an open-source platform, a suite of tools to streamline your ML workflow, supported by the team behind Allegro AI. The suite includes model training logging and tracking, ML pipelines management and data processing, data management, orchestration, and deployment. All these features are reflected in 5 ClearML modules:

ClearML Python Package for integrating ClearML into your existing code-base;
ClearML Server storing experiment, model, and workflow data, and supporting the Web UI experiment manager;
ClearML Agent which is the ML-Ops orchestration agent, enabling experiment and workflow reproducibility, and scalability;
ClearML Data that provides data management and versioning on top of file-systems/object-storage;
ClearML Session that allows you to launch remote instances of Jupyter Notebooks and VSCode.

ClearML is integrated with many frameworks and libraries, including model training, hyperparameter optimization, and plotting tools, as well as storage solutions.

Main advantages:

ClearML Web UI that lets you track and visualize experiments;
An option to work with tasks in Offline Mode, in which all information is saved in a local folder;
Multiple users collaboration enabled by the ClearML Server.

10. Valohai

Valohai is an MLOps platform that automates everything from data extraction to model deployment. The team behind this tool says that Valohai “offers Kubeflow-like machine orchestration and MLflow-like experiment tracking without any setup”. Although experiment tracking is not the main focus of this platform, it provides some functionality such as experiments comparison, version control, model lineage, and traceability.

Valohai is compatible with any language or framework, as well as many different tools and apps. It can be set up on any cloud vendor or in an on-premise setup. The software is also teamwork-oriented and has many features that facilitate it.

Main advantages:

Significant acceleration of the model building process;
Focused on the entire lifecycle of machine learning;
Since it’s a platform built mainly for enterprises, privacy and security are their driving principles.

11. Pachyderm

Pachyderm is an enterprise-grade, open-source data science platform that makes it possible for its users to control an end-to-end machine learning cycle. From data lineage, through building and tracking experiments, to scalability options.

The software is available in three different versions:

Community – free and source-available version of Pachyderm built and backed by a community of experts;
Enterprise Edition – a complete version-controlled platform that can be deployed on the Kubernetes infrastructure of users’ choice;
Hub Edition – Hosted and managed version of Pachyderm.

Main advantages:

Possibility to adapt the software version to your own needs;
End-to-end process support;
Established and backed by a strong community of experts.

12. Kubeflow

Kubeflow is the machine learning toolkit for Kubernetes. Its goal is to use the Kubernetes potential to facilitate the scaling of machine learning models. The platform has some tracking capabilities but it’s not the main focus of the project. It consists of a few components, including:

Kubeflow Pipelines – a platform for building and deploying portable, scalable machine learning (ML) workflows based on Docker containers. It’s probably the most commonly used functionality of Kubeflow;
Central Dashboard – the central user interface (UI) in Kubeflow;
Notebook Servers – a service for creating and managing interactive Jupyter notebook;
KFServing – Kubeflow model deployment and serving toolkit
Training Operators – for the training of ML models in Kubeflow through operators (e.g. PyTorch, TensorFlow).

Main advantages:

A user interface (UI) for managing and tracking experiments, jobs, and runs
An end-to-end open-source platform;
Built-in Notebook server service.

️ Kubeflow vs Neptune

13. Verta.ai

Verta is an enterprise MLOps platform. Its main features can be summarized in four words: track, collaborate, deploy and monitor. These functionalities are reflected in Verta’s main products: Experiment Management, Model Registry, Model Deployment, and Model Monitoring. The software has been created to facilitate the management of the entire machine learning lifecycle.

The Experiment Management component allows you to track and visualize ML experiments, log various metadata, search through and compare experiments, ensure model reproducibility, collaborate on ML projects within a team, and much more.

Verta supports many popular ML frameworks including TensorFlow, PyTorch, XGBoost, ONNX, and more. It’s available as an open-source service, SaaS and Enterprise.

Main advantages:

Possibility to built customizable dashboards and visualize the modeling results;
Collaboration features and user management;
Scalable solution that covers multiple steps of the MLOps pipeline.

14. SageMaker Studio

SageMaker Studio is part of the AWS platform. It allows data scientists and developers to prepare, build, train, and deploy high-quality machine learning (ML) models. It claims to be the first integrated development environment (IDE) for ML. It has four components: prepare, build, train & tune, deploy & manage. The experiment tracking functionality is covered by the third one, train & tune. Users can log, organize and compare experiments, automate hyperparameter tuning, and debug training runs.

Main advantages:

Built-in debugger and a profiler that lets you identify and reduce training errors and performance bottlenecks;
Possibility to track thousands of experiments;
Integration with a wide range of Amazon tools for ML related tasks.

15. DVC Studio

DVC Studio is part of the DVC group of tools powered by iterative.ai. Originally, DVC was an open-source version control system created specifically for machine learning projects. This component still exists, with the aim to enable data scientists to share the ML models and make them reproducible. However, now, there’s also the DVC studio, a visual interface for ML projects, that was created to help users track experiments, visualize them and collaborate on them with the team.

The DVC Studio application can be accessed online or hosted on-premises.

Main advantages:

DVC Studio is a visual interface that can be connected to GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket;
It extracts metadata (model metrics and hyperparameters) from JSON files and presents them in a nice UI;
Applies existing software engineering stack for ML teams.

Learn more

️ DVC vs Neptune

Final thoughts

Tracking machine learning experiments has always been an important element of the ML development process, however, earlier the process was very manual, time-consuming, and error-prone.

Over the last few years, the market of modern experiment tracking and experiment management tools for machine learning has grown and matured. The range of available options is broad and diversified now. No matter if you’re looking for an open-source or enterprise solution, if you prefer a standalone experiment tracking framework or an end-to-end platform – you’ll certainly find the right tool.

Neptune is a tool for experiment tracking and model registry.

It allows you to log, organize, compare, register and share all your ML model metadata in a single place.

Take interactive tour of the Neptune app

See Docs

Explore resources

Check pricing

15 Best Tools for ML Experiment Tracking and Management

How to evaluate an experiment tracking tool?